b-Arbitra, the Belgian journal for arbitration, is an initiative of CEPANI, the Belgian Center of Arbitration and Mediation. The biannual journal subscribes to the objective of CEPANI to promote edifying debate and in-depth research in the field of arbitration and to bring new developments to policy makers’ attention.Toon meer
b-Arbitra, the Belgian journal for arbitration, is an initiative of CEPANI, the Belgian Center of Arbitration and Mediation. The biannual journal is unique in that it welcomes contributions in English, as well as in Belgium’s official languages Dutch, French and German. Each of these articles is accompanied by a summary in the English language.
b-Arbitra subscribes to the objective of CEPANI to promote edifying debate and in-depth research in the field of arbitration, to provide a valuable source of pertinent information to lawyers involved in arbitration, and to bring new developments to policy makers’ attention in order to further the quality of arbitration law and practice. It promotes dialogue on novel issues in the field of arbitration and aims to provide a dynamic forum for the exchange of information on a European scale, in light of the increasing number of cross-border disputes and the internationalization of arbitration.
Table of contents
Articles – Case law – Book reviews – Documents
STEIN, E., MURON, Q., Komstroy, PL Holdings, Micula: closing the door to intra-EU investment arbitration – again?
UK Supreme Court, 27 October 2021. Note: MOREL DE WESTGAVER, C., JONCKHEERE, K., The law applicable to the arbitration agreement: Commentary on the UK Supreme Court’s decisions in Enka v Chubb and Kabab-Ji SAL v Kout Food Group from a Belgian law perspective.
HvB Brussel (17e k ), 29 juni 2021. Note: DOPAGNE, F., Fonds souverain géré par une banque centrale étrangère, simulation et immunité d’exécution.
C A Bruxelles (17e ch ), 16 novembre 2021. Note: FOURET, J., DUPUY, C., Enforcement Judge vs. Annulment Judge, Gunfight at the Brussels Corral.
C A Paris (16e ch ), 22 juin 2021. Note: HOLLANDER, P., MARTINS, M., Quel tribunal (étatique) est compétent pour connaître d’une action en responsabilité dirigée contre un arbitre ?